Women’s History Month – October 2013


Women’s History Month – October 2013


womenshistmonth2013_infoen600In 1992, October was proclaimed Women’s History Month to acknowledge and celebrate the achievements of women throughout Canadian history.

October was chosen to coincide with anniversary of the Persons Case, which On October 18, 1929 – through the courage and determination of theFamous Five, the five Canadian women who launched the case – established once and for all that women were “persons” when the Privy Council overturned a Supreme Court of Canada decision and ruled that women were indeed persons, and could become Senators. The ruling not only opened the political doors for Canadian women.

On November 30, the Deputy Minister of Justice replied that the proposed questions were unacceptable. First, he said, the only power allowing admission into the Senate was conferred by the BNA Act upon the Governor General. It was evident that the exercise of that power rested on the interpretation of the word “persons” in section 24. Therefore, the only relevant question was to determine if this word included women. As for the other two questions, he explained, the BNA Act does not confer any power of amendment to the Parliament of Canada.

It also clearly asserted that women’s equality rights in Canada were fundamental. Irene Parlby (1878-1965), suffragette and politician. She was elected president of the women’s branch of the United Farmers of Alberta in 1916 and became a member of the Alberta legislature in 1921. She was still a member of Parliament at the time of the Persons Case. Photo: Courtesy of the Glenbow Archives, Canada, Alberta. NA-2204-12

It was not until April 24, 1928 that the Supreme Court of Canada rendered its decision and declared that women were not persons. Yet, in spite of that decision, Minister of Justice Ernest Lapointe declared that women had a legal right to sit in the Senate and that measures would be taken to amend the BNA Act accordingly. But Emily Murphy was not going to wait for some hypothetical amendment. In May 1928, undaunted, she resolved to appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in London, England, which was, at that time, the final court of appeal for Canadians. “Nothing can stop us from winning”, she wrote to her colleagues in arms.

persons caseA copy of her May 1928 letter and a copy of the petition were sent to the Deputy Minister of Justice on July 26, 1928. Emily Murphy explained in the letter the reasons for the appeal. In the Supreme Court, she said, discussion had been centered on the meaning of the word “qualified” (used in section 24 of the BNA Act) as it applied to the word “persons”. The true issue rested elsewhere and their question remained therefore unanswered. She added, a few months later, that by appealing to the British Privy Council she had wished to remove the issue from the political arena and have it addressed from a purely legal aspect.

On November 16, 1928, she obtained permission to appeal to the Privy Council.13 The hearing on the “Persons” case, which was postponed several times, was finally set for July 18, 1929, and continued on July 23 and 25.

The appellants had argued before the Supreme Court that nothing in the BNA Act stated that the word “persons” did not apply to women. On the contrary, the proof was that the right to vote given to women at the federal level stemmed from an interpretation of the word “persons” that included women. The Crown based its defence, however, on historical considerations and stated that, at the time the BNA Act was drafted, women could not hold public positions. There had thus been no intention in the Act of admitting women into the Senate.

The British Privy Council rejected this argument. According to the members, if in the past no women had acceded to such a position, it was because custom prevented it, and that customs became traditions stronger than law and remained unchallenged long after they had lost their raison d’être. On October 18, 1929, the British Privy Council ruled in favor of women, declaring that they were indeed persons and therefore eligible to sit in the Senate of Canada.

The “Persons” case cost a total of $23,368.47 in lawyers’ fees, paid by the government of Canada; $21,000 was for the appeal to the Privy Council.

Four months later, in February 1930, Mackenzie King seized the opportunity to be the first leader of the Government to allow women into the Senate and appointed Canada’s first woman senator, Cairine Reay Wilson. She had been active in the Victorian Order of Nurses, the Young Women’s Christian Association, the Salvation Army, the Twentieth Century Liberal Association and the National Federation of Liberal Women of Canada. When she was appointed, she had just celebrated her 45th birthday.

Opening this male-dominated bastion to women was an investment in the future, for in 1930 their political role was still undefined. For many more years, women would be limited to voting, and few women would be elected to the Senate, the House of Commons or to provincial legislatures. The appointment of Cairine Wilson reassured the senators, one of whom said in a speech: “We of the humble and gentle sex were apprehensive that one of those strong-minded and determined women with a mission in life and a pair of horned rimmed spectacles would be appointed and we knew that if so she would immediately commence to reform a number of matters that we did not wish reformed…”

Behind this humourous speech transpires the heartfelt sentiment of a senator from Edmonton: “Oh, we never could have had Mrs. Murphy in the Senate. She would have caused too much trouble.” Newspapers echoed the senators’ sentiments, noting how slim the new senator was, how youthful she looked in spite of having had eight children; in one word, they all emphasized her femininity.

What the law allows is one thing, but what opportunity allows is another. For millions of Canadian women, their opportunity to fully use their talents and vision continues to be limited by access to affordable and accessible quality child care. Take Action on Childcare HERE.

nellyNellie L. McClung (1847-1951), novelist, journalist, suffragette and temperance worker. She was a member of the Alberta legislature, the only woman on the Dominion War Council, and the first woman on the CBC Board of Governors. Patent and Copyright Office collection.

Neither Emily Murphy, who had so wanted to become Canada’s first female senator, nor Nellie McClung, nor any of the Famous Five ever got to sit in the Red Chamber. In King’s opinion, Emily Murphy was “a little too masculine and perhaps a bit too flamboyant”. She died in 1933 without ever being appointed to the position for which she had fought so hard.

Today, a bronze plaque at the entrance to the Senate, unveiled in 1938, recalls the victory of the Famous Five. Moreover, a Governor General’s Commemorative Award, created in 1979, rewards exceptional contributions to the promotion of equality for women in Canada.

In Canada, women’s share of unpaid work, including childcare, remains double to that of men; so the lack of quality, affordable child care falls particularly hard on women and their access to work outside the home.

Balancing work and family has always been a challenge for women, but undeterred, women in Canada have made and continue to make a tremendous contribution to science, education, politics, commerce, science, sports, culture, community life, and to the labour movement including our own great union. Yet, many women who would add to these achievements can’t, because access to affordable, publicly funded, good quality child care is not a priority for the Harper government, which dismantled plans for a nationally coordinated system shortly after it was first elected.

Women’s History in Canada deserves to be celebrated and acknowledged. It is a time to look back, but also to commit to a future  where a lack of quality, affordable child care is a historical footnote  — and where no woman is limited by an uncaring government. Add your voice to make that future happen.

UFCW Canada members, activist and allies are also encouraged to download and share a special poster to commemorate Women’s History Month.

Follow these links to learn more about Women in Canada:
The Famous 5 Foundation

Key dates in the history of Canadian Women throughout the 20th Century
ARCHIVED – Celebrating Women’s Achievements
The Irene Parlby Fonds from the General Inventory of the National Archives
The Famous Five on Parliament Hill: a Second Unveiling


Speak Your Mind


Copyright 2014 @ A Celebration of Women™ The World Hub for Women Leaders That Care